Just as silly as expecting ILCs to be operational when submerged in water.
Clearly cars operate in the wet but they don't have any need to have an IP rating for them.
Upvote
0
Sigma officially launches the RF 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Contemporary
- Thread starter Canon Rumors
- Start date
Clearly cars operate in the wet but they don't have any need to have an IP rating for them.
Let me repeat.
What I desire is to see Canikony specify the environmental conditions that they deem to be necessary to say something is weather and dust resistant so that those claims can be verified. Ideally that would be associated with some measuring system so that I and other users understand what if any difference there is better.
For example, is there a material difference between the claims between manufacturers? Or even between say what will be the R1, R3, and R5? If there was, don't you think that would be useful information for consumers?
Do you really want to have a debate about yet another car analogy?
Upvote
0
Rain forms when humidity is 100% in the clouds.
It could be much lower on the ground.
Upvote
0
You made it clear what you desire but it isn’t reasonable hence the feedback
Do you really want to have a debate about yet another car analogy?
I believe that you brought it up
Upvote
0
Isn't it for the manufacturers to say if it is reasonable or not and not for us to guess? Unless you have done specific inside knowledge?
Upvote
0
and you have answered your own question as the camera manufacturers have determined what is reasonable and they haven't provided any weather resistance measurements except for one OEM and only for one model.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
